William Katz / Urgent Agenda
|
|||
|
SNIPPETS
SIZZLING SITES Power Line
|
FOURTH SUBSCRIPTION DRIVE Today we launch our fourth, and most critical, subscription drive. Subscriptions are the lifeblood of Urgent Agenda. Without them, we cannot function. With them, we remain posted at the barricades. This is crucial. We're not in danger of going dark, but, unless we expand our subscriber base, we are in danger of contracting. By subscribing you keep Urgent Agenda going. You also receive The Angel's Corner, our twice-a-week publication delivered by e-mail. There we get into all kinds of things - politics, show business, even, on occasion, tech stuff. At The Angel's Corner we also give the very coveted Pompous Fool award, bestowed on those who meet the highest standards of pomposity and silliness. Recipients have wept at the news that they've won. We also now have our Angel's Corner forum, where you can publish your thoughts on just about anything. You can subscribe for a year, or six months, or donate what you wish. At the request of readers, we're also introducing a family plan. For little more than a year's subscription, you can have a second sent to someone else - like a kid at school whom you want to save from political correctness. You're not getting all you can from Urgent Agenda unless you're a subscriber. So please subscribe in the column on the right. We have a 95% subscriber retention rate - almost unheard of - but if you want to drop your subscription, the unused portion will be refunded with only a few insults. Subscribe today. You're needed. I think we are too.
MONDAY, JUNE 1, 2009
COMMENT: There are, of course, the usual tough words coming out of Washington. Hillary Clinton: "We believe the charges are baseless and should not have been brought and that these two young women should be released immediately." Boy, that'll get 'em. Once again we see the result of our "talk tough, then cave" policy toward North Korea. The North Koreans have see that there are no serious consequences to defying the United States. It's ironic that that these women go on trial the same day President Obama delivers his can't-we-all-get-along speech to the Muslim world. The Muslims are watching North Korea as well. In their world the "strong horse" is the one that's respected. June 1, 2009 Permalink
The president will be in the Mideast this week and will deliver a major address to the Muslim world, from Egypt, on Thursday:
So far, so good, but then comes the escape clause:
He's drunk the leftist Kool-Aid. Out comes the "culture" excuse. But if democracy is a "universal value," how can anyone give "culture" as an excuse for not having it? Also, how does one "impose" freedom? Do we say, "You're free...or else"? This is the old "Who are we to impose our values?" game that you hear in the leftist salons of Washington and Manhattan, and, of course, in our less-than-splendid universities. It is an excuse for "respecting" other cultures, and doing nothing.
He got that line from Jack Kennedy, who often liked to say that we do something because it's hard, not because it's easy. No attribution, of course. And he always manages to shift the discussion back to the alleged sins of the United States, another part of the "Who are we...?" routine. However, here's some potential good news:
Well, there's some progress. Maybe Obama's gotten the message that Americans don't like the Bush-bashing. COMMENT: The president speaks good words about democracy, but his administration has been awfully short on action or commitment. He will deliver his speech to Muslims from a dictatorship. Will he say anything about that? More democracies have been established on America's watch than at any time in human history. We hope the president is aware of that, and sensitive to what his own country has contributed. He might begin his awareness by ending the automatic condemnation of America's actions. By the way, the BBC piece is entitled "Obama Gives Pledge on US 'Values.'" The word "values" is put in quotes, as if there's some doubt that we have any. June 1, 2009 Permalink
But why stop there? The workers in our car company need a place to deposit their paychecks, don't they? Why shouldn't we have a bank to go with our company? You know, it's heartwarming to realize that others are thinking the same thing:
Oh, why not? We're sports.
Pocket money. Loose change. In the age of Obama, $93-bil is a tip. And while we're at it, let's use our imaginations. What else would we like to own? A hotel would be nice. Maybe some department stores. I think we should all write the White House, and wish upon a star. At the rate we're going, a star may be the only thing left that isn't under federal control. This is the most serious transformation of the United States since the great Depression, and the American people seem utterly unaware of the danger to their freedom and independence. Some media we have, ay? June 1, 2009 Permalink
COMMENT: The president will address the Muslim world from Egypt on Thursday. Maybe someone, like an adult, should slip this story to him before he starts apologizing for our democracy. Islamo-fascism remains a severe threat, especially with the potential spread of nuclear and biological weapons. No outreach will change that. June 1, 2009 Permalink
June 1, 2009 Permalink
Now, Bartle Bull comments on this disgrace. Who is Bartle Bull? He is a man with impeccable civil rights credentials - a civil-rights lawyer in Mississippi in 1966, New York campaign manager for Robert Kennedy in 1968. His words count:
COMMENT: You will notice the lack of interest by the mainstream media in reporting this story and probing Mr. Obama's Justice Department. The press is too busy telling us the life story of Judge Sonia Sotomayor, and relating that diners were thrilled this past weekend when Barack and Michelle showed up on their romantic date in New York - a date that cost taxpayers tens of thousands of dollars. It is Bartle Bull's conclusion that really gets to us. Please read it:
Change we can believe in. June 1, 2009 Permalink
COMMENT: Those who are turning America into a new Titantic are still alive and well, and living in Washington. June 1, 2009 Permalink
COMMENT: Myths die hard, don't they? The story says that GM "once conflated its interests with the country's..." That is a reference to a statement made by GM's chief, Charles E. Wilson, at his confirmation hearings for secretary of defense in the Eisenhower administration. A less-than-responsible news report quoted Wilson as saying that what was good for General Motors was good for the country. The quote produced an immediate uproar. What was left out is that Wilson also said that what was good for the country was good for General Motors. By the time the whole quote came out, Wilson's reputation was damaged. We can only read this story with dismay, but we should be asking questions that the mainstream media is not asking. If anyone told you a year ago that this would be happening, would you have believed it? How did all this economic damage occur so quickly, culminating in a remarkable, if fearful opportunity for the most leftist president in American history to remake the economy of the United States? I am not engaging in a conspiracy theory, but I've noted before that the economic meltdown of last September occurred right in the middle of a presidential campaign, and could only have helped Obama. Now we have the Obama crowd running car companies. Another question, unasked: How will the operation of GM by the federal government impact the rest of the auto industry, and the design of its products? Remember, Ford is functioning. So are Honda, Toyota, Nissan, and European companies. All can take up the slack. But what if Washington, under pressure from radical environmentalists with a lock grip on the Democratic Party, reshapes the GM product line and is able, with an infusion of taxpayer money, to cut the prices of the cars and knife the competition? Will other companies be forced to follow, making Washington the decider of what America buys, rather than the American customer? That is not a "cute" question about choices in upholstery and CD decks. It goes to a fundamental issue of economic freedom and the discipline of the market. Milton Friedman made the point that you cannot have political freedom without economic freedom. Think about that today. June 1, 2009 Permalink
That is all we know right now. COMMENT: It is extremely rare for a plane to just "disappear." Planes do not fall out of the sky without reason, and there usually is some distress signal, or, if the flight was over land, smoke coming from a wreckage. Inevitably, there will be suspicion of terrorism, but we urge caution. Let the search continue. June 1, 2009 Permalink
SUNDAY, MAY 31, 2009
Now we will see how the nation reacts to this unacceptable crime. After 9/11 we were told not to blame all Muslims for the actions of a few. That was correct. But let us see if that same standard is applied to the pro-life movement, which is overwhelmingly non-violent. Don't hold your breath. Tiller was a public figure, often a lightning rod for protests because he was willing to perform those late-term abortions. Some believed he was violating the law and tried to bring him to justice. It was entirely proper for commentators to either praise or denounce him. It was obviously outrageous for anyone to kill him. This was a criminal act. It must be seen that way, not as a reflection of any movement. The saddest thing would be for the pro-choice people to try to exploit the crime for their own ends. The debate over abortion should continue in a civilized manner, unaffected by this single expression of lawlessness. May 31, 2009 Permalink
COMMENT: We're sure the six tourists a year will enjoy it, and both North Korea and Iran will make contributions to its upkeep. A Saudi visitor center would also be nice. Urgent Agenda pledges to provide maps to get around the site without losing too much time. May 31, 2009 Permalink
Notice the phraseology. We're being tested. Our stated position, thus far, is the correct one:
But...
The key point:
COMMENT: Hope is not a strategy. Let's see if we stand firm, or buckle. Now is a time for Cuban-Americans to make their voices heard on behalf of freedom for the island. If Obama/Clinton cave on this one, what will that tell North Korea and Iran? May 31, 2009 Permalink
Not so fast. Apparently, we're going back to the Bush rules:
COMMENT: I have seen no evidence that this administration is any more open than any other. They should stop claiming that they are, unless they can produce some journalistic change we can believe in. May 31, 2009 Permalink
Not a ringing endorsement.
That is correct. Obama, and many of those around him, believe the world is best left to those with high SAT scores. On to Iran:
And Venezuela:
Don't stop there:
And...
Finally...
COMMENT: There goes Ralph's White House invitation. Of course, much of what he says is on target. Few object to reasonable engagement, even with hostile nations. However, there have to be limits, red lines, and so far we haven't seen any. One more talk. One more session. One more UN meeting. One more magical diplomacy tour by the president. Meanwhile, technology moves forward. Technology, in the hands of the wrong people, has become the monster in our path. May 31, 2009 Permalink
|
"What you see is news. What you know is background. What you feel is opinion." THE ANGEL'S CORNER Part I of this week's Angel's Corner was sent Wednesday night. Part II was sent Friday night.
SUBSCRIPTIONS Subscriptions to URGENT AGENDA are voluntary. Why subscribe to something you're getting free? To help guarantee that you'll continue to get it at all, and to get The Angel's Corner, which we now offer to subscribers and donators. Subscriptions sustain us. Payments are through PayPal and are secure, but you do not have to sign up for a PayPal account. Credit cards are fine.
FOR A SIX-MONTH ($26) SUBSCRIPTION, CLICK: IF YOU DON'T WISH A SET SUBSCRIPTION, BUT PREFER TO DONATE ANY OTHER AMOUNT TO SUSTAIN URGENT AGENDA, CLICK:
THE CURRENT QUESTION Last week we asked: If you could give one paragraph of realistic advice to President Obama, what would it be? You can view the answers here.
Wait until later in the week to answer this. Give your reaction to President Obama's "outreach" speech to the Muslim world, delivered in Egypt. If you'd like to send us your thoughts, click:
POWER LINE It's a privilege for me to post periodic pieces at Power Line. To go to Power Line, click here. To link to my Power Line pieces, go here.
CONTACT YOU CAN E-MAIL US, AS FOLLOWS: If you have wonderful things to say about this site, if it makes you a better person, please click: If you have a general comment on anything you see here, or on anything else that's topical, please click:
|
|
| ````` | ```````` | ||